Welcome Sisters, Brothers, Mothers and Fathers who join this blog. All Love!

We started Agnihotra Homa Therapy 1978. We have been doing Homa Farming in the Middle East and lecture on our personal experiences in Europe and Asia. Most impressive experience with this Technology was the miraculous healings we experienced on us,on our children, family members, friends and neigbours. On our farm we only used Agnihotra ash powder, Agnihotra Ash water solution and of course the regular performance of Agnihotra as well as other Homa Fires.Wonderful how easy this process is. Not much education required. It's simple and easy applicable in everyones busy life, because it just takes 5 to 10 minutes of our time, depend on the experience. We invite you: "Come join us and heal the world. God bless you."(Please note: articles published may not be of our opinion, but for the sake of comunication, education, exchange and discussion papers are posted here).

Sonntag, 21. Juni 2009

Prof. Y.S.Paul, Dr. Rameshwar and Dr. J.P. Saini joining Agnihotra

Four days tour in company of scientist from Agriculture University Palampur Himachal Pradesh.

By Reiner
Aim: Visiting Homa Organic Farmers and learn about there experience
The group consist of: Mr. V.Soni, Dr. Rameshwar, Dr. S. Bhan, Dr. P.Sood , Dr. J.P.Saini , Prof. Y.S. Paul and Mr. Reiner from Fivefold Path Mission.
The tour was leading us into the apple belt of Himachal Pradesh. November 2008 farmers began to perform Homa Organic Farming by establishing the Homa Therapy Resonance point on their farms.
Palampur University had decided to follow up the development of this Homa Projects through regular visits. Therefore experts of different scientific topics followed the group, like plant pathologist, entomologist, soil scientist, agronomist, economist and horticulturist.
All the farms visited were organic farms.
The first hold was on a farm which not yet has established the Homa Therapy Resonance Point (HTRP), but Agnihotra is performed daily.
The second farm about 7 km air distance away used the HTRP. One could see clearly the difference in the appearance of the plant, the health, the production etc. How much more energy and vigor plants show on the resonance farm. The owner Mr. P. Chauhan made a little experiment with his potatoes. He planted three fields of potatoes. On one fields he used 1 kg of Agnihotra Ash on his plantation on the other two field not. After the harvest he clearly saw that the harvest of the Agnihotra Ash potato field had duple the yield as compared to the other two fields. He was very happy about this result. The scientist were unanimous in their opinion that his apple tree look healthy and vigor and the fruit bearing was good compared to average fruit bearing on the neighbors land. The trees looked more bright, deeper color and strong health appearance.
In spite of performing Homa Organic Farming already for the last four years at the University it self and observing many fantastic results with Agnihotra Ash treatment the scientist remarked:” we are more and more convinced that Homa Organic Farming is the solution for the world Agriculture and Horticulture problems faced today”.
Homa Therapy is totally revealed science from Vedic times. It is not a religious worship or a prayer or a Puja what so ever. Here we deal with energies which are available at this particular time of sunrise and sunset and we use this Homa Technology to synchronize with this energies at this particular moment and attract them to the coordinate of the planet were the sun is set to rise. (You may read more in the book:”Homa Therapy, Our last Chance, by Vasant V. Paranjpe).
The plants reach out for all that life energy and grow healthy and strong. The same thing happens to humans as well. A lot of documentation is already available about the effect of Homa Therapy on plant function, cow and animal health and performance, human health, effects on environment and genetic modifications which come about naturally, and the neutralization of harmful radioactive radiations.
Thanks to the effort of the scientific society. We will be able to understand more to overcome the confusion created by people who can not get the point that Veda means knowledge and not superstition. If we follow this revelations exactly as they are told, All of us will benefit irrespectively of our religious believes. We may be Muslim, Hindu or member of any other religion; we will harvest the benefits of Homa Therapy Agnihotra Technology.
We already have changed our world to such an extent that some scientist believe we only have a few more year on this planet before live will be totally extinguished, wiped out from mother earth.
Here we are not talking about dooms day. We have the solution for our problem in hand. Easy everyone can see the result and create a harmonious environment in his/her vicinity by applying Homa Therapy Agnihotra daily. It hardly takes a bout 10 minutes of our time. Ten Minutes for a change to stay on this planet and survive. A small price!

Sushil Mehta doing Tryambakam Yajnya

Experience of Homa Therapy

By Sushil Mehta, Halyana, Himachal Pradesh

I am doing Homa since Nov. 2008 in my own farm. Earlier it was hard to believe that fruits will come out by enchanting some Mantras. But we wonted to know about it and started Homa. For two three month we found not much changes but when the blossom time came the Homa Farm felt different from others farms. We have three different farms. We are practicing Homa only on one farm all other farm are organic farms. This year the crop was only 20% of the last year crop because of the dry winter conditions. So I calculated that the effect of natural calamities was less on the Homa field. Now days I observe that the trees near the Homa Hut are showing good growth and fruits as compared to the far ones. Any one visiting the fields can observe such things with naked eyes. All these things happening now makes believe in ones mind that there is some energy behind all the Homa Fires which can not be seen but is helping the plants grow faster and healthier then on other non Homa Farms.

Sonntag, 14. Juni 2009

SHREE Vasant V. Paranjpe Messenger of the Sacred Fire

Cowshed near Agnihotra Resonance Point at Parmath Niketan


Letter to Dr. Gloria Luz Guzman Mendez
Jorge Rios AlvaradoZootecnic Engineer, with Masters in Agro-Cattle Systems of Production, Main Professor and Dean of the Department of Zootecnia of the UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AGRARIA DE LA SELVA, at Tingo Maria, (Peruvian Amazon).I. INTRODUCTIONAbout 47 % of farms in the High Huallaga, have an agro-cattle component. They are the ones which produce most profit. They are not big but present better conditions due to biodiversity and the functionality of their components, which are better managed by their owners.Interactive interviews are important tools while observing dynamic agro-cattle systems, because they include detailed discussions, analysis, understanding, comparison etc., which allow to infer concretely about the objectives of the research.Among the components evaluated in the different aspects of agro-cattle farms, we found Homa therapy being practiced by some. Initially I was skeptical. However, when I continued to visit and to evaluate, I was surprised by the results observed. This fact allowed to begin to use some indicators in order to be able to evaluate scientifically, specially the cattle sector.The results concerning advancement up to date, are satisfactory, comparing farms without the therapy and those with Homa therapy, in spite of the fact that only two farms used Homa therapy, those of Mr. Juan Muñoz Pérez in Milagros (Huanuco) and Mr. Américo Pérez in Tocache, (San Martin).
· External morphology of breeded bovine cattle (cows, bulls and calves) for meat, with good characteristics of formation of muscular masses, compared with animals in farms without HOMA therapy.· Excellent shine in the fur of animals with a good health appearance, as compared with animals without the therapy.· Weight at the time of stopping breast feeding, heavier with Homa therapy than those without the therapy and in lesser time.· Animals tend to become more docile with the therapy.· Young bulls to be made fat gained good weight (50 kilos), by eating only pasture, common salt and 2 kilos of Agnihotra ash, compared with mineral salts and pasture eatenby animals in farms without the therapy.· Pastures improve their yield and quality, this is why the weight of the animals increases.

Reproductive Index (%) 88.6
Cow’s Mortality (%) 1.8
Calf’s Mortality (%) 3.5
Muscle Development (%) 16.0
Weight at Birth (kg) 35.0 – 40.0
Difficult Birth (%) 0
Placenta Retention (%) 0
Cow – calf separation (months) 5.0
6.0 – 7.0
Source: The author, March 20012.1.
STUDY OF CROPS COMPONENT.With regard to the crops one could observe:· Absence of plagues and sicknesses in the crops of plantain, cocoa, citrus fruits, vegetables, in some cases with little incidence.· It improves the production and the quality of agricultural products.· The environment is notably healthier· After harvest, HOMA products have greater durability, compared with the traditional (chemical) ones.· Studies of farms with depleted soils due to the cultivation of coca, were carried out. One could notice slight improvement in the composition of the minerals of the soil, according to analysis done in the laboratory of the UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AGRARIA DE LA SELVA. These were an outcome of the Masters Thesis in Systems of Production carried out by myself. An evaluation was also made of the economic effect of the therapy on the farms. The results show that the best economic results were in the agro-cattle systems.

III. CONCLUSIONS1. Observations have been followed up during 1.5 years2. In spite of the fact that there were only two samples of farms applying Homa Therapy and there were several samples of farms without the therapy, the results obtained are superior in favor of Homa Therapy farms; in some cases, significantly but in other cases, with high significance.IV. RECOMMENDATIONS1. It is necessary to continue to evaluate the indicators in order to be able to validate what has been observed and to analyze them statistically through the multivariate analysis to compare variables, which will allow inferring with greater veracity the results.2. It is necessary to carry out laboratory analysis of blood, Agnihotra, soil, water, pastures, crops, etc. in order to be able to compare the therapy with those who do not use Homa Therapy.3. It is recommended to evaluate the validation of Homa Therapy through a multi- disciplinary team (agronomists, zoologists, veterinarians, nutritionists, plant pathologists, sociologists, forestry experts, etc.) for a better evaluation and analysis of the results and of the research processes.4. Broaden the evaluation with a greater number of producers who manage Homa Therapy and with a greater number of cattle and agricultural components with regards to breeding and cultivation, respectively.5. Greater inter-institutional coordination, as well as with the producers to facilitate the research.Signature and Seal
Tingo Maria, May, 2001

Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2009

Homa Therapy On genetic mutation

Homa organic farming system itself brings about genetic mutations in plants. All these are beneficial as we have experienced it.
For example cocoa is harvested twice in a year but we started harvesting cocoa every month. This is due to genetic mutation brought about by atmospheric purification. (Note: We have seen this in places where the Homa Therapy Resonance Technique has been installed).This thing is told in ancient knowledge and they say that you can grow large quantities of food in a small area with better quality, taste, nutrition and longer shelf life. All these mutations are beneficial environmentally, helpful and scientific.
Genetic mutation that we are talking about now refers to GM introduced by companies like Monsanto and some others. To reduce the use of pesticides they say the plant itself will be able to repel the pest and no pesticide will be required. However again after a little while the pest acquires immunity and they will require stronger pesticides.
1. So one point is food grown by such methods, will it have nutritive qualities which are necessary?
2. Will human beings be able to extract nutrition from that food or will their capacity be hampered as days go by? It has definitely been proven that when animals were fed with BT cotton they have died. They have died on a large scale with pain in the body.
So first of all we have to test scientifically what will be the side effect of such Monsanto GM products. That has not been done.
It takes several years to do it and it is bound to show that it is harmful.
The company knows this. So it is trying to use all sorts of corrupt methods of bribing the government people and pushing there crime all over the world.
Unfortunately for mankind they have succeeded in destroying nearly all parts of the earth, the greatest crime done against humanity.
Only HOMA atmosphere will be able to heal the evil effects of these companies.
So we can see that the GM that they have made is faulty.
We will see from the above discussion that we are not against the science of genetic mutation but it just has to be done scientifically. Tests have to be taken for several years.



By the Institute for Responsible Technology, You’re Consumer Safety Partner - May 20, 2009
This week, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) called on Physicians to educate their patients, the medical community, and the public to avoid GM (genetically modified) foods when possible and provide educational materials concerning GM foods and health risks. They called for a moratorium on GM foods, long-term independent studies, and labeling. AAEM`s position paper stated, Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food, including infertility, immune problems, accelerated aging, insulin regulation, and changes in major organs and the gastrointestinal system. They conclude, there is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation, as defined by recognized scientific criteria. The strength of association and consistency between GM foods and disease is confirmed in several animal studies.
More and more doctors are already prescribing GM-free diets. Dr. Amy Dean, a Michigan internal medicine specialist, and board member of AAEM says, I strongly recommend patients eat strictly non-genetically modified foods. Ohio allergist Dr. John Boyles says I used to test for soy allergies all the time, but now that soy is genetically engineered, it is so dangerous that I tell people never to eat it. Dr. Jennifer Armstrong, President of AAEM, says, Physicians are probably seeing the effects in their patients, but need to know how to ask the right questions. World renowned biologist Pushpa M. Bhargava goes one step further. After reviewing more than 600 scientific journals, he concludes that genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are a major contributor to the sharply deteriorating health of Americans.
Among the population, biologist David Schubert of the Salk Institute warns that children are the most likely to be adversely effected by toxins and other dietary problems related to GM foods. He says without adequate studies, the children become the experimental animals.The experience of actual GM-fed experimental animals is scary. When GM soy was fed to female rats, most of their babies died within three weeks compared to a 10% death rate among the control group fed natural soy. The GM-fed babies were also smaller, and later had problems getting pregnant. When male rats were fed GM soy, their testicles actually changed color from the normal pink to dark blue. Mice fed GM soy had altered young sperm. Even the embryos of GM fed parent mice had significant changes in their DNA. Mice fed GM corn in an Austrian government study had fewer babies, which were also smaller than normal. Reproductive problems also plague livestock. Investigations in the state of Haryana, India revealed that most buffalo that ate GM cottonseed had complications such as premature deliveries, abortions, infertility, and prolapsed uteruses. Many calves died. In the US, about two dozen farmers reported thousands of pigs became sterile after consuming certain GM corn varieties. Some had false pregnancies; others gave birth to bags of water. Cows and bulls also became infertile when fed the same corn. In the US population, the incidence of low birth weight babies, infertility, and infant mortality are all escalating.
GM corn and cotton are engineered to produce their own built-in pesticide in every cell. When bugs bite the plant, the poison splits open their stomach and kills them. Biotech companies claim that the pesticide, called Bt produced from soil bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis has a history of safe use, since organic farmers and others use Bt bacteria spray for natural insect control. Genetic engineers insert Bt genes into corn and cotton, so the plants do the killing.
The Bt-toxin produced in GM plants, however, is thousands of times more concentrated than natural Bt spray, is designed to be more toxic, has properties of an allergen, and unlike the spray, cannot be washed off the plant. Moreover, studies confirm that even the less toxic natural bacterial spray is harmful. When dispersed by plane to kill gypsy moths in the Pacific Northwest, about 500 people reported allergy or flu-like symptoms. Some had to go to the emergency room. The exact same symptoms are now being reported by farm workers throughout India, from handling Bt cotton.[xiii] In 2008, based on
Medical records, the Sunday India reported, Victims of itching have increased massively this year . . . related to BT cotton farming.
GMOS PROVOKE IMMUNE REACTIONS AAEM states, multiple animal studies show significant immune dysregulation, including increase in cytokines, which are associated with asthma, allergy, and inflammation all on the rise in the US. According to GM food safety expert Dr. Arpad Pusztai, changes in the immune status of GM animals are a consistent feature of all the studies. Even Monsanto`s own research showed significant immune system changes in rats fed Bt corn. A November 2008 by the Italian government also found that mice have an immune reaction to Bt corn. GM soy and corn each contain two new proteins with allergenic properties, GM soy has up to seven times more trypsin inhibitora known soy allergen, and skin prick tests show some people react to GM, but not to non-GM soy. Soon after GM soy was introduced to the UK, soy allergies skyrocketed by 50%. Perhaps the US epidemic of food allergies and asthma is a casualty of genetic manipulation.
In India, animals graze on cotton plants after harvest. But when shepherds let sheep graze on Bt cotton plants, thousands died. Post mortems showed severe irritation and black patches in both intestines and liver (as well as enlarged bile ducts). Investigators said preliminary evidence strongly suggests that the sheep mortality was due to a toxin. . . . most probably Bt-toxin.=94 In a small follow-up feeding study by the Deccan Development Society, all sheep fed Bt cotton plants died within 30 days; those that grazed on natural cotton plants remained healthy. In a small village in Andhra Pradesh, buffalo grazed on cotton plants for eight years without incident. On January 3rd, 2008, the buffalo grazed on Bt cotton plants for the first time. All 13 were sick the next day; all died within 3 days. BT corn was also implicated in the deaths of cows in Germany, and horses, water buffaloes, and chickens in The Philippines. In lab studies, twice the number of chickens fed Liberty Link corn died; 7 of 20 rats fed a GM tomato developed bleeding stomachs; another 7 of 40 died within two weeks. Monsanto=92s own study showed evidence of poisoning in major organs of rats fed Bt corn, according to top French toxicologist G. E. Seralini.
The only published human feeding study revealed what may be the most dangerous problem from GM foods. The gene inserted into GM soy transfers into the DNA of bacteria living inside our intestines and continues to function. This means that long after we stop eating GMOs, we may still have potentially harmful GM proteins produced continuously inside of us. Put more plainly, eating a corn chip produced from Bt corn might transform our intestinal bacteria into living pesticide factories, possibly for the rest of our lives. When evidence of gene transfer is reported at medical conferences around the US, doctors often respond by citing the huge increase of gastrointestinal problems among their patients over the last decade. GM foods might be colonizing the gut flora of North Americans. Warnings by government scientists ignored and denied. Scientists at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had warned about all these problems even in the early 1990s. According to documents released from a lawsuit, the scientific consensus at the agency was that GM foods were inherently dangerous, and might create hard-to-detect allergies, poisons, gene transfer to gut bacteria, new diseases, and nutritional problems. They urged their superiors to require rigorous long-term tests.[xxvii] But the White House had ordered the agency to promote biotechnology and the FDA responded by recruiting Michael Taylor, Monsanto`s former attorney, to head up the formation of GMO policy. That policy, which is in effect today, denies knowledge of scientists` concerns and declares that no safety studies on GMOs are required. It is up to Monsanto and the other biotech companies to determine if their foods are safe. Mr. Taylor later became Monsanto`s vice president.
DANGEROUSLY FEW STUDIES, UNTRACEABLE DISEASES AAEM states, GM foods have not been properly tested and pose a serious health risk. Not a single human clinical trial on GMOs has been published. A 2007 review of published scientific literature on the potential toxic effects/health risks of GM plants revealed that experimental data are very scarce. The author concludes his review by asking, Where is the scientific evidence showing that GM plants/food are toxicologically safe, as assumed by the biotechnology companies?
Famed Canadian geneticist David Suzuki answers, the experiments simply haven`t been done and we now have become the guinea pigs. He adds, Anyone that says, 'Oh, we know that this is perfectly safe', I say is either unbelievably stupid or deliberately lying. Dr. Schubert points out, If there are problems, we will probably never know because the cause will not be traceable and many diseases take a very long time to develop. If GMOs happen to cause immediate and acute symptoms with a unique signature, perhaps then we might have a chance to trace the cause. This is precisely what happened during a US epidemic in the late 1980s. The disease was fast acting, deadly, and caused a unique measurable change in the blood but it still took more than four years to identify that an epidemic was even occurring. By then it had killed about 100 Americans and caused 5,000-10,000 people to fall sick or become permanently disabled. It was caused by a genetically engineered brand of a food supplement called L-tryptophan. If other GM foods are contributing to the rise of autism, obesity, diabetes, asthma, cancer, heart disease, allergies, reproductive problems, or any other common health problem now plaguing Americans, we may never know. In fact, since animals fed GMOs had such a wide variety of problems, susceptible people may react to GM food with multiple symptoms. It is therefore telling that in the first nine years after the large scale introduction of GM crops in 1996, the incidence of people with three or more chronic diseases nearly doubled, from 7% to 13%. To help identify if GMOs are causing harm, the AAEM asks their members, the medical community, and the independent scientific community to gather case studies potentially related to GM food consumption and health effects, begin epidemiological research to investigate the role of GM foods on human health, and conduct safe methods of determining the effect of GM foods on human health.
Citizens need not wait for the results before taking the doctors advice to avoid GM foods. People can stay away from anything with soy or corn derivatives, cottonseed and canola oil, and sugar from GM sugar beets=97unless it says organic or non-GMO. There is a pocket Non-GMO Shopping Guide, co-produced by the Institute for Responsible Technology and the Center for Food Safety, which is available as a download, as well as in natural food stores and in many doctors’ offices.
If even a small percentage of people choose non-GMO brands, the food industry will likely respond as they did in Europe by removing all GM ingredients. Thus, AAEM`s non-GMO prescription may be a watershed for the US food supply. http://www.opposingviews.com